In addition to forcing firms to reexamine their risk management controls, the recent credit derivatives meltdown has given Wall Street's project management offices (PMOs) -- the groups that zealously monitor and sometimes manage the status of IT projects -- a new focus. "A major challenge Wall Street firms are struggling with is the need to develop a derivatives platform," notes Mike McKeon, SVP at IT strategy and consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton.
"The derivatives business has been growing significantly. Some products are fairly mature, and the technology and processes used for them have matured," McKeon continues. "But for other products, the business hasn't matured and the processes are highly manual."
While many financial services vendors hawk derivatives processing solutions, "Often [vendor] products are just a piece of the puzzle," McKeon adds. "It's a lot of integration work." This is where a PMO comes in -- to manage and lead the efforts to integrate technologies and design new processes to use the technology effectively.
At State Street, a newly formed project management office was heavily involved in the development of a derivatives processing platform that the firm currently is piloting, according to Mike Bullock, the firm's senior vice president of global product management. He notes that State Street expects to go live with the system in May.
The new platform is based on FpML -- the Financial products Markup Language, an XML message standard used by the OTC derivatives industry -- and links into DTCC's DerivSERV and Markit Partners' SwapsWire confirmation and settlements services, Bullock explains. Once a trade is fully FpML-compliant, he says, there's no need for the faxes, phone calls and e-mails that are commonly used today to settle a derivatives contract.
Fostering Adoption
As State Street began developing the derivatives platform in October 2007, Bullock relates, the firm formed a four-person PMO to help with business adoption of this and other projects. The group is responsible for client prioritization and conversion, product architecture, rate cards, operating and technology roles, the operating model, the operating architecture, technology development and technology implementation, he describes. "If there's any software or hardware infrastructure that needs to be set up in our offices around the globe, the PMO works with IT to ensure the delivery of help desks, security or other business continuity needs," Bullock says.
The PMO's role in prioritization helped drive the derivatives processing platform to completion within a matter of months, according to Bullock. "What's important to the business and what we've heard from a product point of view is that derivatives is a top initiative for 2008," he says. "The amount of interest on the part of our clients hasn't let up. We know we are spending money in the right place."
In addition to helping set priorities, the PMO also figures out how to roll out new software programs, such as the derivatives platform, efficiently around the world, Bullock notes. "We invest in products, but, more importantly, we need to get them in the hands of our business and clients as quickly as possible, and we need to do that concurrently around the globe," he says. "It can't be a sequential rollout -- our clients are global and they want to see it Day One."
Meeting Customers' Needs
The PMO, Bullock explains, keeps track of where customers' accounts are based and therefore to which countries a new platform must be immediately extended. It communicates with external and internal customers as products are being built to make sure all concerns and requirements are being met.
State Street's PMO pays for itself in a variety of ways, Bullock says. In the firm's middle-office business, for example, the PMO generates opportunities to provide derivatives processing outsourcing for clients. It's also helping to reduce risk and gain operational efficiencies, Bullock adds, noting that the group provides integrated project reports through an online portal, versus an earlier, scattershot approach.
According to Bullock, the PMO will manage the development and rollout of all new platforms going forward. The templates built for the derivatives processing platform, he notes, will be used for a forthcoming SWIFT messaging platform and a collateral management system, so the best practices discovered during the building of the new derivatives platform can be repurposed.
Source URL: http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200824
Publish Date: April 15, 2008
Wednesday, April 23, 2008
Hedge Funds Say Technology Is Critical to Business
As institutional investors increasingly turn to alternative investments, hedge funds' assets continue to mushroom. As a result, hedge fund executives increasingly see technology as a critical business enabler, particularly in the middle office, a recent Aite Group survey reveals.
According to the 20 hedge fund executives polled by the Boston-based advisory firm, technology investments aimed at improving operations are top priorities for 2008. Among the hedge funds' goals are improving automation around OTC derivatives, adding collateral management technology, exerting better control over prime brokerage charges and rates, improving access to data and reporting capabilities, and enhancing automation to boost efficiency and reduce errors.
Source URL:http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200116
Publish Date: April 11,2008
According to the 20 hedge fund executives polled by the Boston-based advisory firm, technology investments aimed at improving operations are top priorities for 2008. Among the hedge funds' goals are improving automation around OTC derivatives, adding collateral management technology, exerting better control over prime brokerage charges and rates, improving access to data and reporting capabilities, and enhancing automation to boost efficiency and reduce errors.
Source URL:http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200116
Publish Date: April 11,2008
Buy Side Seeks Independent Valuation Providers for OTC Derivatives After Credit Crisis
As the credit crisis continues to rock the U.S. economy, buy-side institutions that entered into OTC derivatives contracts with sell-side firms are taking steps to price the over-the-counter derivatives with independent, third-party sources. In the past, buy-side firms mainly obtained prices from their counterparties -- the investment banks that created the OTC derivatives instruments and calculated the prices with their own proprietary models.
"If I'm an investment banker creating these derivatives, who knows more [about them] than me?" says Paul Migliore, CEO of investment management consulting firm Citisoft North America. But since the broker-dealers often are on the opposite sides of these transactions -- and they stand to profit or lose money depending on the direction of the market -- relying on their calculations could pose a conflict of interest, he explains. "The big thing in the market is that no one trusts the dealers to price these instruments," Migliore adds.
Part of the problem is that OTC derivatives -- opaque, complex instruments that are linked to the movement of equities, interest rates, currencies and commodities -- are not traded on exchanges, so a true market price is hard to determine. Additionally, some derivatives are illiquid, making it even more difficult to value them.
Of course, as the credit crisis in subprime mortgages magnified and investors turned away from complex derivatives, including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), dealers had an even harder time pricing them. Eventually, the dealers were forced to write down $150 billion in losses (as of press time) as a result.
Now the sell-side financial engineers and math whizzes responsible for valuing the OTC derivatives don't appear to be so smart. "Clearly, the sell-side has not done a good job of pricing these products," comments Michael Henry, the head of Accenture's financial services strategy practice in North America.
With uncertainty over how to price OTC derivatives roiling the entire fixed-income market, the buy side is seeking independent sources to validate The Street's bids and offers. "As a fund administrator, I need to find data points to come up with that valuation," explains Joseph Holman, founder and managing partner of Columbus Avenue Consulting, a hedge fund administrator based in New York with $6.5 billion in assets under administration.
"A market price, or any price, has to be observed; and to be observed, someone has to transact," Holman continues. "In the credit markets, where there's talk of a lack of liquidity, people aren't buying anything, and that affects valuations."
While mutual funds and hedge funds have been moving toward independent valuations of OTC derivatives for the past few years, the credit crisis has accelerated the search for neutral third parties to calculate and sign off on derivatives prices. "The CDO market environment was a wake-up call for the entire financial services industry," comments Judson Baker, derivatives product manager at Chicago-based Northern Trust, which offers an asset-pricing service for listed and OTC derivatives.
Independent Derivatives Pricing Gaining Momentum
The trend toward independent pricing also is gaining momentum due to the explosive growth in OTC derivatives trading by traditional asset managers and pension funds. Some asset managers have hundreds and even thousands of open derivatives contracts on their books, which they must mark to market from an accounting perspective, explains Citisoft's Migliore. "If one position is losing money, you have to go out and create another, synthetic derivative to offset the first derivative," he says.
According to Northern Trust's Baker, even though none of the clients of his firm's independent valuation service held customized CDOs, the subprime mortgage meltdown has had repercussions for pricing all derivatives. "The collapse of certain instruments [CDOs] had a profound ripple effect across all derivatives and their valuations," he says. "It's a call to arms for having robust and transparent valuations for your OTC derivatives."
Northern Trust began offering its OTC derivatives valuation service three years ago when it noticed a large spike in the number of derivatives its clients traded as well as a spike in the number of clients -- traditional pension funds (public and private), corporations, endowments, asset managers, hedge funds, mutual funds and private equity -- that had grown more comfortable with the use of derivatives. "We've seen tremendous [derivatives] volume growth in the last five years that outpaced the industry, sometimes three to five times over that," Baker relates. "We recognized the need to provide enhanced services for OTC derivatives," he adds, noting their offerings cover derivatives processing, independent derivatives valuation and collateral management.
To create the valuation service, Northern Trust hired three specialist firms: Markit Group; Bear Direct, a service of Bear Stearns; and SuperDerivatives. "That is their business -- to run models and collect data and to independently provide OTC derivatives valuations," says Baker.
According to Baker, Markit is a well-rounded provider in that it covers credit, interest rate, commodities, currencies and equity derivatives, and can handle all asset classes. SuperDerivatives, he says, specializes in currencies, equities and interest rate derivatives, but is getting better in commodities and is starting to cover credit derivatives as well. Baker adds that Northern Trust used Bear Direct for interest rate and credit derivatives because that is their strength as a sell-side firm; he notes that Bear had a "Chinese wall" between the trading desk and the asset-pricing service.
In light of the collapse of Bear Stearns and its fire sale to JPMorgan Chase, however, Baker says Northern Trust is reexamining its relationship with Bear Direct. "After the issue with Bear Stearns surfaced, we have closely monitored their output and service," he notes. "We continue to use Bear Direct, but have reverted to using them as a secondary source. We are assessing their business model and will soon determine if and how our relationship will change."
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
Before Northern Trust launched its valuation service, the bank's clients relied on their investment managers -- who either used their own proprietary risk management models or counterparties' (i.e., brokers') prices -- to value derivatives, Baker reports. But "having your investment manager supply a value that they could manipulate is not objective," he stresses, adding that this potential conflict of interest was a major driver behind Northern Trust's decision to develop a more independent audit check for its clients. Another reason that drove Northern to develop a more independent audit check was their focus on governance best practices.
If the investment manager has control over the pricing model, "They could tweak the model and they could manipulate the price to something they want it to be," suggests Baker. "It's not in the client's best interest, and sometimes the investment manager's compensation is based on the performance of that derivative. They could inflate the price of that derivative, and their compensation could be based on it. So obviously we saw a conflict of interest there."
This apparent conflict of interest may be the No. 1 driver behind the buy side's push for independent derivatives pricing services. "Investors are saying they want independent looks at the books," asserts Ed Crouch, global head of corporate and strategic development at SuperDerivatives. "Auditors say they want independent looks [too]. These two things have led the revaluation part of our business to explode."
According to Crouch, SuperDerivatives is seeing a dramatic increase in demand from buy-side firms for valuation services in order to put a fair market value on their books of derivatives holdings. "Global custodians are saying they have trillions of dollars of this paper and it hasn't gone away, and they need an independent market of that book," he comments.
At the same time, hedge funds also are pressing their fund administrators to obtain an independent price source. In January, for example, Columbus Avenue Consulting selected SuperDerivatives' Credit Derivatives Platform, SD-CD, to price its hedge fund clients' portfolios of credit default swaps. The firm uses Bloomberg to price equities and spot currencies.
Buy-side participants maintain that vendors are more neutral than broker-dealers because they are not involved in the trades. "The vendors have no idea which side the trade is on," says Northern Trust's Baker. "They don't even know the quantity [of the positions]. We don't share client data or even which side of the trade our client is on. The notionals and quantities remain protected. They value the instruments by collecting data for their models. It's not skewed to the bid or ask side either," he adds, noting that the vendors' valuations typically fall at a midpoint price.
Further, there are a number of vendors in the derivatives valuation space to choose from. "We think with those three primary firms we get best-of-breed independent valuations," Baker says, referring to SuperDerivatives, Markit and Bear Direct. Northern Trust, he explains, gets values back from two or three of those sources and then compares them to see how they stack up against each other. Baker calls this a valuation hierarchy.
Columbus Avenue Consulting's Holman confirms that the industry is reducing its reliance on single sources for derivatives prices. "You see a lot of reliance on a variety of sources," he says, noting that there are different methodologies for comparing the various sources.
"We use multiple pricing services now, which I would never have considered [previously]," Holman adds. "It used to be that you looked at one broker quote -- you looked at the bid or took the mean of the bid-ask. Today we're creating matrices of broker quotes. We'll take three broker quotes and we'll come up with an average bid-ask spread, and we'll take the average of that bid-ask."
Different Pricing Strokes for Different Folks
According to Mayiz Habbal, SVP of Celent's securities and investments practice, the buy side has three options when it comes to figuring out the right approach to pricing OTC derivatives. The first choice -- the easy approach -- is to use the counterparty price when valuing the position, he says. The downside, of course, is that there's no transparency into the sell-side's model. "Since it's not independent pricing, there may be errors, and the counterparty doesn't provide the price on a regular basis," Habbal comments. "If you want to do it cheaply, that is what you would do. [But] then you would be exposing yourself tremendously."
The second approach, Habbal says, is to set up an internal valuation entity within the asset management firm. This method hearkens back to the mid-1990s when the investment banks came up with analytics to manage the derivatives they were selling.
"The differentiation is how [sell-side firms] manage the risk for what they are selling," Habbal explains. "Jumping over to the buy side, you see the buy side trying to do the same." If a buy-side firm has deep pockets and enough knowledge of derivatives, Habbal adds, it will set up an internal valuation unit. A perfect example of this is hedge funds that internally price OTC derivatives to figure out if there are any arbitrage opportunities.
The advantage of this option is that the buy-side firm has complete control over and transparency into the pricing process. In the long run, it's helpful to understand the instruments, Habbal says. However, on the downside, this entails heavy infrastructure costs and investments in market data implementation and people.
"You will add another complex process that will also consume a lot of internal resources," Habbal warns, adding, "Once you have the function, you have to keep pumping money into [it] to keep it going."
While some analysts say the buy side, with the exception of hedge funds, lacks the expertise to undertake a project of this kind, Putnam Investments developed its own internal OTC derivatives calculation engine to gain competitive advantage. "We have financial engineers on staff that understand these instruments -- that understand the modeling -- almost as well as the business," says Eric Meltzer, Putnam's head of investment technology at Putnam Investments in Boston.
The third option, according to Habbal, is to find an independent evaluator. Vendors typically offer valuation services via an application service provider (ASP) model, in which the asset manager sends its trades, terms and conditions over the Internet to the vendor and gets prices back, he notes. The benefits of this model include cost efficiency, scalability and flexibility, says Habbal.
One negative, however, is that "expertise will not be nurtured internally," Habbal points out. But while many of these services are "black boxes" that offer the buy side little transparency into vendors' models, the vendors often will share some details, he adds.
Banks that have the money, Habbal predicts, will develop their own internal OTC derivatives valuation capabilities and also explore third-party pricing services. "That is the ultimate [solution]," he says.
Citisoft's Migliore, however, says he doesn't know of a lot of asset managers building their own models to price derivatives. "We're not seeing anybody wanting to build their own OTC derivative valuation systems themselves -- they are looking at vendors and products out there," he contends, pointing out that "There are third-party pricing services that are out in the marketplace right now that [asset managers] can bring in-house to price their assets."
In addition, "Buy-side firms are looking to their current third-party custody bank relationships and fund administrators to provide this stuff," says Migliore. "A lot of asset managers are asking their custodians to price OTC derivatives." Global custodians "sit in the middle -- they work with the asset managers and the broker-dealer community, and they do the settlements," Migliore explains.
The Data-Collection Burden
For its part, Northern Trust decided to partner with vendors not only to increase speed to market, but also to relieve itself of the burden of OTC market data collection and the interpretation of that data, according to the firm's Baker. "The hard part about valuation is not the model, because the models are so standard now," he says. "It's more about collecting the data."
Data collection involves polling brokers and arranging to have multiple broker-dealers transmit live trading information back to the firm, Baker says. In the end, Baker adds, the goal is to provide complete transparency into the OTC derivatives pricing process.
To do that, a firm has to be able to show which entity provided which value, how and when the price was updated, and whether the price was fresh or stale, Baker notes. In addition, the firm must monitor the sources of data to provide a consistent and accurate source of data day after day and month after month, he says. "It's very difficult, very risky and it's not where we are positioned," Baker explains.
But even though Northern Trust relies on vendors to aggregate the information on which derivatives prices are based, the firm still is heavily involved in the valuation process, Baker stresses. "We're constantly reviewing how actively that data is updated, and if there is a concern the inputs are stale, we do everything we can to initiate better inputs," he says.
Further, Northern Trust continually is expanding the coverage of its service to keep pace as its vendors pick up other derivatives instruments. "There's always development taking place -- there's always capital assigned to [the asset service's] expansion," Baker says. "[Independent derivatives pricing] is definitely one of the crucial parts of the industry."
Also in the same article -
Putnam Investments Sees Competitive Advantage in Building OTC Derivatives Pricing Engine In-House
MARKET PARTICIPANTS are upgrading their technology to improve derivatives processing
Source URL: http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200087
Publish Date: April 22, 2008
"If I'm an investment banker creating these derivatives, who knows more [about them] than me?" says Paul Migliore, CEO of investment management consulting firm Citisoft North America. But since the broker-dealers often are on the opposite sides of these transactions -- and they stand to profit or lose money depending on the direction of the market -- relying on their calculations could pose a conflict of interest, he explains. "The big thing in the market is that no one trusts the dealers to price these instruments," Migliore adds.
Part of the problem is that OTC derivatives -- opaque, complex instruments that are linked to the movement of equities, interest rates, currencies and commodities -- are not traded on exchanges, so a true market price is hard to determine. Additionally, some derivatives are illiquid, making it even more difficult to value them.
Of course, as the credit crisis in subprime mortgages magnified and investors turned away from complex derivatives, including collateralized debt obligations (CDOs), dealers had an even harder time pricing them. Eventually, the dealers were forced to write down $150 billion in losses (as of press time) as a result.
Now the sell-side financial engineers and math whizzes responsible for valuing the OTC derivatives don't appear to be so smart. "Clearly, the sell-side has not done a good job of pricing these products," comments Michael Henry, the head of Accenture's financial services strategy practice in North America.
With uncertainty over how to price OTC derivatives roiling the entire fixed-income market, the buy side is seeking independent sources to validate The Street's bids and offers. "As a fund administrator, I need to find data points to come up with that valuation," explains Joseph Holman, founder and managing partner of Columbus Avenue Consulting, a hedge fund administrator based in New York with $6.5 billion in assets under administration.
"A market price, or any price, has to be observed; and to be observed, someone has to transact," Holman continues. "In the credit markets, where there's talk of a lack of liquidity, people aren't buying anything, and that affects valuations."
While mutual funds and hedge funds have been moving toward independent valuations of OTC derivatives for the past few years, the credit crisis has accelerated the search for neutral third parties to calculate and sign off on derivatives prices. "The CDO market environment was a wake-up call for the entire financial services industry," comments Judson Baker, derivatives product manager at Chicago-based Northern Trust, which offers an asset-pricing service for listed and OTC derivatives.
Independent Derivatives Pricing Gaining Momentum
The trend toward independent pricing also is gaining momentum due to the explosive growth in OTC derivatives trading by traditional asset managers and pension funds. Some asset managers have hundreds and even thousands of open derivatives contracts on their books, which they must mark to market from an accounting perspective, explains Citisoft's Migliore. "If one position is losing money, you have to go out and create another, synthetic derivative to offset the first derivative," he says.
According to Northern Trust's Baker, even though none of the clients of his firm's independent valuation service held customized CDOs, the subprime mortgage meltdown has had repercussions for pricing all derivatives. "The collapse of certain instruments [CDOs] had a profound ripple effect across all derivatives and their valuations," he says. "It's a call to arms for having robust and transparent valuations for your OTC derivatives."
Northern Trust began offering its OTC derivatives valuation service three years ago when it noticed a large spike in the number of derivatives its clients traded as well as a spike in the number of clients -- traditional pension funds (public and private), corporations, endowments, asset managers, hedge funds, mutual funds and private equity -- that had grown more comfortable with the use of derivatives. "We've seen tremendous [derivatives] volume growth in the last five years that outpaced the industry, sometimes three to five times over that," Baker relates. "We recognized the need to provide enhanced services for OTC derivatives," he adds, noting their offerings cover derivatives processing, independent derivatives valuation and collateral management.
To create the valuation service, Northern Trust hired three specialist firms: Markit Group; Bear Direct, a service of Bear Stearns; and SuperDerivatives. "That is their business -- to run models and collect data and to independently provide OTC derivatives valuations," says Baker.
According to Baker, Markit is a well-rounded provider in that it covers credit, interest rate, commodities, currencies and equity derivatives, and can handle all asset classes. SuperDerivatives, he says, specializes in currencies, equities and interest rate derivatives, but is getting better in commodities and is starting to cover credit derivatives as well. Baker adds that Northern Trust used Bear Direct for interest rate and credit derivatives because that is their strength as a sell-side firm; he notes that Bear had a "Chinese wall" between the trading desk and the asset-pricing service.
In light of the collapse of Bear Stearns and its fire sale to JPMorgan Chase, however, Baker says Northern Trust is reexamining its relationship with Bear Direct. "After the issue with Bear Stearns surfaced, we have closely monitored their output and service," he notes. "We continue to use Bear Direct, but have reverted to using them as a secondary source. We are assessing their business model and will soon determine if and how our relationship will change."
Avoiding Conflicts of Interest
Before Northern Trust launched its valuation service, the bank's clients relied on their investment managers -- who either used their own proprietary risk management models or counterparties' (i.e., brokers') prices -- to value derivatives, Baker reports. But "having your investment manager supply a value that they could manipulate is not objective," he stresses, adding that this potential conflict of interest was a major driver behind Northern Trust's decision to develop a more independent audit check for its clients. Another reason that drove Northern to develop a more independent audit check was their focus on governance best practices.
If the investment manager has control over the pricing model, "They could tweak the model and they could manipulate the price to something they want it to be," suggests Baker. "It's not in the client's best interest, and sometimes the investment manager's compensation is based on the performance of that derivative. They could inflate the price of that derivative, and their compensation could be based on it. So obviously we saw a conflict of interest there."
This apparent conflict of interest may be the No. 1 driver behind the buy side's push for independent derivatives pricing services. "Investors are saying they want independent looks at the books," asserts Ed Crouch, global head of corporate and strategic development at SuperDerivatives. "Auditors say they want independent looks [too]. These two things have led the revaluation part of our business to explode."
According to Crouch, SuperDerivatives is seeing a dramatic increase in demand from buy-side firms for valuation services in order to put a fair market value on their books of derivatives holdings. "Global custodians are saying they have trillions of dollars of this paper and it hasn't gone away, and they need an independent market of that book," he comments.
At the same time, hedge funds also are pressing their fund administrators to obtain an independent price source. In January, for example, Columbus Avenue Consulting selected SuperDerivatives' Credit Derivatives Platform, SD-CD, to price its hedge fund clients' portfolios of credit default swaps. The firm uses Bloomberg to price equities and spot currencies.
Buy-side participants maintain that vendors are more neutral than broker-dealers because they are not involved in the trades. "The vendors have no idea which side the trade is on," says Northern Trust's Baker. "They don't even know the quantity [of the positions]. We don't share client data or even which side of the trade our client is on. The notionals and quantities remain protected. They value the instruments by collecting data for their models. It's not skewed to the bid or ask side either," he adds, noting that the vendors' valuations typically fall at a midpoint price.
Further, there are a number of vendors in the derivatives valuation space to choose from. "We think with those three primary firms we get best-of-breed independent valuations," Baker says, referring to SuperDerivatives, Markit and Bear Direct. Northern Trust, he explains, gets values back from two or three of those sources and then compares them to see how they stack up against each other. Baker calls this a valuation hierarchy.
Columbus Avenue Consulting's Holman confirms that the industry is reducing its reliance on single sources for derivatives prices. "You see a lot of reliance on a variety of sources," he says, noting that there are different methodologies for comparing the various sources.
"We use multiple pricing services now, which I would never have considered [previously]," Holman adds. "It used to be that you looked at one broker quote -- you looked at the bid or took the mean of the bid-ask. Today we're creating matrices of broker quotes. We'll take three broker quotes and we'll come up with an average bid-ask spread, and we'll take the average of that bid-ask."
Different Pricing Strokes for Different Folks
According to Mayiz Habbal, SVP of Celent's securities and investments practice, the buy side has three options when it comes to figuring out the right approach to pricing OTC derivatives. The first choice -- the easy approach -- is to use the counterparty price when valuing the position, he says. The downside, of course, is that there's no transparency into the sell-side's model. "Since it's not independent pricing, there may be errors, and the counterparty doesn't provide the price on a regular basis," Habbal comments. "If you want to do it cheaply, that is what you would do. [But] then you would be exposing yourself tremendously."
The second approach, Habbal says, is to set up an internal valuation entity within the asset management firm. This method hearkens back to the mid-1990s when the investment banks came up with analytics to manage the derivatives they were selling.
"The differentiation is how [sell-side firms] manage the risk for what they are selling," Habbal explains. "Jumping over to the buy side, you see the buy side trying to do the same." If a buy-side firm has deep pockets and enough knowledge of derivatives, Habbal adds, it will set up an internal valuation unit. A perfect example of this is hedge funds that internally price OTC derivatives to figure out if there are any arbitrage opportunities.
The advantage of this option is that the buy-side firm has complete control over and transparency into the pricing process. In the long run, it's helpful to understand the instruments, Habbal says. However, on the downside, this entails heavy infrastructure costs and investments in market data implementation and people.
"You will add another complex process that will also consume a lot of internal resources," Habbal warns, adding, "Once you have the function, you have to keep pumping money into [it] to keep it going."
While some analysts say the buy side, with the exception of hedge funds, lacks the expertise to undertake a project of this kind, Putnam Investments developed its own internal OTC derivatives calculation engine to gain competitive advantage. "We have financial engineers on staff that understand these instruments -- that understand the modeling -- almost as well as the business," says Eric Meltzer, Putnam's head of investment technology at Putnam Investments in Boston.
The third option, according to Habbal, is to find an independent evaluator. Vendors typically offer valuation services via an application service provider (ASP) model, in which the asset manager sends its trades, terms and conditions over the Internet to the vendor and gets prices back, he notes. The benefits of this model include cost efficiency, scalability and flexibility, says Habbal.
One negative, however, is that "expertise will not be nurtured internally," Habbal points out. But while many of these services are "black boxes" that offer the buy side little transparency into vendors' models, the vendors often will share some details, he adds.
Banks that have the money, Habbal predicts, will develop their own internal OTC derivatives valuation capabilities and also explore third-party pricing services. "That is the ultimate [solution]," he says.
Citisoft's Migliore, however, says he doesn't know of a lot of asset managers building their own models to price derivatives. "We're not seeing anybody wanting to build their own OTC derivative valuation systems themselves -- they are looking at vendors and products out there," he contends, pointing out that "There are third-party pricing services that are out in the marketplace right now that [asset managers] can bring in-house to price their assets."
In addition, "Buy-side firms are looking to their current third-party custody bank relationships and fund administrators to provide this stuff," says Migliore. "A lot of asset managers are asking their custodians to price OTC derivatives." Global custodians "sit in the middle -- they work with the asset managers and the broker-dealer community, and they do the settlements," Migliore explains.
The Data-Collection Burden
For its part, Northern Trust decided to partner with vendors not only to increase speed to market, but also to relieve itself of the burden of OTC market data collection and the interpretation of that data, according to the firm's Baker. "The hard part about valuation is not the model, because the models are so standard now," he says. "It's more about collecting the data."
Data collection involves polling brokers and arranging to have multiple broker-dealers transmit live trading information back to the firm, Baker says. In the end, Baker adds, the goal is to provide complete transparency into the OTC derivatives pricing process.
To do that, a firm has to be able to show which entity provided which value, how and when the price was updated, and whether the price was fresh or stale, Baker notes. In addition, the firm must monitor the sources of data to provide a consistent and accurate source of data day after day and month after month, he says. "It's very difficult, very risky and it's not where we are positioned," Baker explains.
But even though Northern Trust relies on vendors to aggregate the information on which derivatives prices are based, the firm still is heavily involved in the valuation process, Baker stresses. "We're constantly reviewing how actively that data is updated, and if there is a concern the inputs are stale, we do everything we can to initiate better inputs," he says.
Further, Northern Trust continually is expanding the coverage of its service to keep pace as its vendors pick up other derivatives instruments. "There's always development taking place -- there's always capital assigned to [the asset service's] expansion," Baker says. "[Independent derivatives pricing] is definitely one of the crucial parts of the industry."
Also in the same article -
Putnam Investments Sees Competitive Advantage in Building OTC Derivatives Pricing Engine In-House
MARKET PARTICIPANTS are upgrading their technology to improve derivatives processing
Source URL: http://www.wallstreetandtech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207200087
Publish Date: April 22, 2008
Sunday, April 13, 2008
OTC derivatives trading remains a slow process, report finds
Industry group promises improvements, but no quick fix likely
While the processing of the over-the-counter derivative transactions has improved over the past few years, it is still a surprisingly slow process.
That state of affairs was underscored by a report released today by Aite Group. In it, Aite reports that the bulk of over-the-counter derivatives processing is done by hand. That, in turn, can lead to errors.
A single contract traded verbally and recorded on paper can involve between 80 and 100 variables in terms and conditions. In addition, many parties take part in the process, including not only a buyer (such as a hedge fund) and a seller (such as an insurance company), but also processing entities such as broker-dealers and prime brokers.
Part of the problem stems from the staggering growth in the market. The derivatives market stood at $516 trillion in outstanding notional value as of June 2007, according to the Bank for International Settlements, and it continues to grow. Interest-rate derivative contracts represent the largest chunk of the market, but credit derivatives are the fastest growing segment.
Trading systems have not kept pace, and industry players are clearly aware of the problem. In late March, a group of trade associations and major broker-dealers submitted a letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and other regulators that confirmed their commitment to improving the processing of credit and equity derivatives.
The Aite report noted that a firm can upgrade to a fully automated system and still see little gain. Why? “OTC derivative trade processing is unique is that counterparties are tied to each other in a way that does not exist in the listed markets,” wrote Denise Valentine, senior analyst with Aite Group. “Ultimately, a firm is only as automated as its counterparty’s processing capability.”
To satisfy customer requests, many broker-dealers are paying for the development of electronic systems. “Yet, the large volumes and lack of automation in the non-listed derivative business still mean a manual maintenance routine for many firms,” the report noted.
By Marine Cole
Source URL: http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080403/REG/998586512/1036
Publish Date: 03 April, 2008
That state of affairs was underscored by a report released today by Aite Group. In it, Aite reports that the bulk of over-the-counter derivatives processing is done by hand. That, in turn, can lead to errors.
A single contract traded verbally and recorded on paper can involve between 80 and 100 variables in terms and conditions. In addition, many parties take part in the process, including not only a buyer (such as a hedge fund) and a seller (such as an insurance company), but also processing entities such as broker-dealers and prime brokers.
Part of the problem stems from the staggering growth in the market. The derivatives market stood at $516 trillion in outstanding notional value as of June 2007, according to the Bank for International Settlements, and it continues to grow. Interest-rate derivative contracts represent the largest chunk of the market, but credit derivatives are the fastest growing segment.
Trading systems have not kept pace, and industry players are clearly aware of the problem. In late March, a group of trade associations and major broker-dealers submitted a letter to the Federal Reserve Bank of New York and other regulators that confirmed their commitment to improving the processing of credit and equity derivatives.
The Aite report noted that a firm can upgrade to a fully automated system and still see little gain. Why? “OTC derivative trade processing is unique is that counterparties are tied to each other in a way that does not exist in the listed markets,” wrote Denise Valentine, senior analyst with Aite Group. “Ultimately, a firm is only as automated as its counterparty’s processing capability.”
To satisfy customer requests, many broker-dealers are paying for the development of electronic systems. “Yet, the large volumes and lack of automation in the non-listed derivative business still mean a manual maintenance routine for many firms,” the report noted.
By Marine Cole
Source URL: http://www.financialweek.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080403/REG/998586512/1036
Publish Date: 03 April, 2008
Monday, April 07, 2008
Reuters Delivers New Derivatives Pricing Service
A New service from Reuters promises to deliver bespoke valuations for derivatives and other complex securities. The Reuters DataScope Derivatives Pricing Service is part of Reuters' overall strategy to speed up the valuation process for complex instruments, the London-based firm says.
Requested prices for bespoke transactions are provided using Reuters' methodology for valuation. Reuters claims the DataScope Derivatives Pricing Service is a major step toward transparency in pricing and methodology, as well as speed in the valuation of derivatives.
"Many of our clients trade financial instruments for which establishing the correct market price can be difficult. This service allows them to tap into the independence and integrity of Reuters to give a custom-made guide to the value of securities they hold," said Tim Rice, global head of Reuters Pricing and Reference Data, in a release.
Publish Date: 14 March, 2008
Markit’s Moving Fast Into Derivatives Processing
When we saw Markit Group buy SwapsWire and then BOAT in quick succession, we knew it was time to take a closer look at the aggressive British entrant into the U.S. derivatives processing market.
Founded in 2001, Markit started out as a provider of independent credit derivatives pricing. Its derivatives indices, such as ABX and CDX, have become critical in firms' struggle to accurately determine the value of outstanding derivatives contracts whose underlying assets may be murky. ABX, for instance, tracks the performance of a set of credit default swaps based on U.S. subprime home loans (the derivatives prices themselves are provided by a consortium of 16 investment banks).
It is widely understood that Markit's indices effectively are the only independent means (other than complex mathematical models that cannot take into account factors such as underwriting quality) available to estimate the value of certain types of derivatives. But not everyone is a fan of the indices.
"They're fallacious because they reflect an environment that doesn't exist," contends Dick Bove, analyst at Punk Ziegel. For instance, Markit's CMBX index of commercial mortgage-backed securities recently reflected a 6 percent to 8 percent imputed loss in U.S. commercial real estate when the actual loss was a quarter of 1 percent, according to Bove. "People buying the securities are estimating a far worse disaster than is actually occurring," he says. Accounting rule FAS 157 requires banks to mark certain products down to the implied value of the indices, even if they still are performing well, Bove notes. What firms should do, he believes, is value securities according to how well they actually are performing, rather than based on indices that reflect only what securities buyers think.
Markit concedes that its indices are not perfect. "What an index tells you is where the derivative category is moving; to some extent, that's a symptom rather than a cause," responds Jeff Gooch, EVP and head of trade processing and valuations at Markit. "It helps, because it gives you something to watch. And it does, to a certain extent, reflect some liquidity issues as well as everything else that goes into valuing these products."
Markit also provides a Reference Entity Database (RED) Service -- a set of business entity identifiers to which dealers can refer in order to standardize documentation and avoid mistakes. RED has become so essential to the credit derivatives market that the DTCC has said it will soon start rejecting contracts coming into its Trade Information Warehouse that lack RED coding.
A Thirst for Operations
Markit began its foray into derivatives automation in May 2006, when it acquired White Plains, N.Y.-based Communicator, which offered an OTC derivatives processing platform for trade confirmation, pricing, valuation and trade lifecycle events (the product has been renamed Markit Trade Processing). "We made a very definite decision to get into the processing space," recalls Gooch, who previously ran global OTC derivatives operations at Morgan Stanley.
"The general health of the OTC markets is very dependent on processing efficiency," he continues. "If the industry collectively is going to sort out the problems in derivatives processing, it's going to need to move the bulk of the volume for confirmation in those markets over to electronic platforms."
According to Gooch, across all asset classes, less than half of current derivatives contracts are confirmed electronically. "We think there's going to be a need for a lot more electronic solutions in the processing area," he says.
Last November, Markit announced its agreement to buy SwapsWire, an electronic confirmation network for dealers, interdealer brokers, prime brokers and buy-side firms to exchange trade data and confirm OTC transactions. Gooch believes the move will help electronic adoption by providing some needed vendor consolidation.
"If you look at the current landscape, it's split across a number of vendors -- SwapsWire being one very big player; DTCC with their DerivServ offering being another; and also Markit's Trade Processing Platform. Then there's a number of very small firms, such as TZero. ... That's confusing to people," Gooch explains, adding that system integration difficulties often arise for firms that are connected to multiple vendors.
"We believe there's a need for consolidation in this space -- that the dealer community needs to have some influence and control over what's going on, and Markit is 70 percent owned by major dealers," Gooch adds.
Markit specifically chose SwapsWire, according to Gooch, because the platform is front-office oriented, suiting Markit's natural client base. "It gets the traders involved with resolving the issues on a given trade, and it does so very quickly after execution," he says.
It also helped that SwapsWire was another dealer-owned consortium that, incidentally, shared many of the same dealer owners as Markit. "There's very little geographic or product overlap, which is fantastic in terms of creating synergies," Gooch notes.
Head-to-Head With the DTCC?
The SwapsWire acquisition could bring Markit head-to-head with the Depository Trust & Clearing Corp., which provides clearing, settlement and information services for equities, corporate and municipal bonds, government and mortgage-backed securities, money market instruments, and over-the-counter derivatives. But, Gooch notes, DTCC is owned and controlled by the same banks that own and control Markit, and the two organizations have a shared agenda.
"Our current trade processing platform is the biggest single provider of trades to their platform -- we send them 30,000 to 40,000 trades a month," Gooch relates. Although Markit and DTCC have individual products that compete with one another, he says, that is being worked out.
But while Gooch says Markit and DTCC "have a very active relationship in both directions," he adds, "I'm hoping this deal with SwapsWire doesn't change that."
According to a DTCC spokesperson, "We have a strong, long-standing relationship with Markit, as we do with a host of complementary service providers, and we look forward to continuing to work with them to enhance operating efficiencies and reduce operational risks in the OTC derivatives market. For example, we built our Trade Information Warehouse -- the centralized global repository and post-trade processing infrastructure for servicing credit derivatives contracts -- with an open architecture to enable access by third-party service providers, including Markit and SwapsWire."
The DTCC automates the clearing of credit derivatives trades, of which 90 percent now are handled electronically. But only about 20 percent of equity derivatives and 40 percent of interest rate derivatives trades are electronic -- both types of trades that SwapsWire processes. "We need to try to convince those people that are on paper to move to automation, particularly in equities," Gooch insists. "Otherwise, collectively, there's going to be a problem."
Markit Predictions
So what's Markit's road map for getting there? According to Gooch, major initiatives include growing the company's footprint in the equity space and leveraging its January acquisition of BOAT, a platform for the collection and distribution of European OTC pre- and post-trade information.
Markit also will expand its valuation products. The company is working with six investment banks to develop a platform that will aggregate the banks' and Markit's derivatives pricing data to help institutional investors and fund managers value OTC derivatives and determine portfolio performance. Markit aims to launch the platform, Markit Valuations Manager, in the second half of 2008 with coverage of bonds and derivatives. It later will be expanded to include more banks and all major cash and derivative asset classes, the company has said.
Publish Date: 17 March, 2008
SuperDerivatives Clients Connect to Liffe Trading Platform
The derivatives pricing provider and Liffe will provide direct access to the Liffe Connect electronic trading platform.
“The partnership will give SuperDerivatives customers the ability to price, analyze and trade exchange-traded Liffe products within SuperDerivatives’ applications alongside over-the-counter (OTC) products—allowing them greater flexibility in choosing the right market for realizing their investment goals. SuperDerivatives’ certification for our newly launched Liffe Connect 10.0 brings other important benefits to their customer base, including full access to the functionality within the Liffe Connect application programming interface and full market data,” says Paul MacGregor, director of technology partnerships at Liffe.
The synergy of the two platforms will enable SuperDerivatives users to see streaming prices from Euronext and interact with the market through SuperDerivatives' Web-based applications. SuperDerivatives’ pricing system will merge OTC prices with exchange prices to maximize transparency for users with the target of tightening the bid-offer spreads in the corresponding exchange products.
Publish Date: 26 February 2008
Thursday, April 03, 2008
T-Zero, Omgeo Respond to Call for Better Derivatives Processing
Derivatives and the way they're handled have been under the glare of the spotlight ever since the Fed's intervention in the Bear Stearns crisis, which was largely precipitated by the firm's highly leveraged credit derivatives positions. "These [over-the-counter derivatives] markets have grown tremendously; but the infrastructure has not kept up — and it must," said Treasury Secretary Paulson in mid-March. Last week, 18 major Wall Street players and three organizations (ISDA, MFA and SIFMA) sent a letter to Timothy Geithner, president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which they vowed to continue to automate credit and equity derivatives processing, including making consistent use of electronic confirmation platforms and submitting novation requests (replacing one obligation with another or replacing a party to an agreement with a new party) via electronic platforms rather than by email.
We knew it would only be a matter of time before derivatives processing platform vendors would come out with upgrades to meet these requirements So far, we've seen announcements from T-Zero and Omgeo for automating novations and repurchase agreements.
T-Zero addressed the novations requirement by rolling out Novations+ processing for its credit derivative affirmation platform. The new technology integrates with the DTCC's Trade Warehouse and enables buy-side and sell-side firms to submit novation requests electronically rather than by email, even for blocks of trades. T-Zero says it has more than 180 users who are buy-side firms, dealers and prime brokers.
Omgeo's announcement yesterday focused on repurchase agreements. The company announced that its customers can now process repurchase agreements and reverse purchase agreements through its TradeSuite platform, alongside U.S. equity and fixed income products through its Oasys TradeMatch trade confirmation service. Omgeo says the addition of repo functionality in TradeSuite is part of release 7.0, which gives trade counterparties the tools to enhance internal workflows and limit the use of paper in post-trade processing.
Source URL:http://www.financetech.com/showArticle.jhtml?articleID=207001550Publish Date: 03 April, 2008
Wednesday, April 02, 2008
Fed warns of persistent processing problems in OTC derivatives market
Despite moves by the largest credit derivatives dealers to clear settlement backlogs, the major volume surges in mid-2007 showed that "processing challenges" still persist in the over the counter derivatives (OTC) markets, says The Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
However the Fed has welcomed new commitments by banks to streamline processing of credit and equity derivatives trades outlined in a letter to Fed president Timothy Geithner.
In the letter, dated 27 March, 18 Wall Street banks outline major operational goals for 2008, including consistent use of electronic confirmation platforms for eligible trades and the settlement of trades through a centralised process by September. The dealers also aim to have all novation requests submitted via electronic platforms, rather than e-mail, during the year.
"Our goal is a marketplace that matches its trades on trade date," states the letter.
Regulators originally met with the banks in September 2005 to voice concerns about risk management practices in the rapidly growing credit derivatives market. Following that meeting the banks pledged to automate and streamline operations and cut backlogs. The Fed says since then the dealers have reduced confirmations outstanding more than 30 days by 85%, increased electronic processing to more than 90% of all credit derivative trades and eliminated the risk of novations causing dealers not to know their counterparties.
But soaring volumes in the middle of last year again highlighted persistent processing problems in the OTC credit derivatives markets, says the Fed.
"To support long-term growth, the processing infrastructure must be capable of processing transactions efficiently through periods of sustained high volume and market volatility," says the regulator is a statement.
However the Fed says the bank's new commitments recognise that achieving this objective "requires end-to-end automation, increased interoperability and targeted improvements to the processing workflow".
See complete Fed document - http://www.finextra.com/finextra-downloads/newsdocs/NYfedletter0308.pdf
Source URL: http://www.finextra.com/fullstory.asp?id=18285
Publish Date: 01 April, 2008
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)